For the benefits of those who cant read chinese, below is the article found on Chinapress titling "Speaker stated there's no need for immediately resolution"
The articles stated that the Parliment Deputy Speaker Datuk Wan Junaidi Tuanku claimed that since the case between Grand Saga & Narajaya has been brought up to court, and there's no need for immediately attention, as the 2 reasons to reject a special motion raised by the Serdang MP Teo Nie Chin to discuss on the BMC barricade issue.
The decision by the Deputy speaker has cause several unrest among the opposition parties and there's was a 15 min debate on the decision by the Deputy Speaker.
Datuk Wan Junaidi Tuanku further stated that firstly, the deputy speaker feels that there no need for immediate resolution, secondly, since the case has been brought up to the court, according to the parliment regulation, it cannot be discuss anymore.
DAP's Tony Pua Kiam Wee then stated that if the incident incolved beating, then the issue can be discuss at parliment. However, the Deputy Speaker asked him not to interfear as there are still many other important topic to be discussed.
The Deputy Speaker further stated that he knows the importance of the issue but as a Legislative committee, he has to abite to the law of this country.
Serdang MP Teo Nie Chin however disagree as she stated that this involved Grand Saga and the developer, Narajaya. Furthermore, it also involved Police beating citizens, thus this is very important.
M.Kura Segaran, who is a lawyer by profession, raised that the parliamentary practices No. 18（3）stated if there are more than 15 parliment members support, the parliment must agreed for the special motion.
Datuk Wan Junaidi Tuanku also claimed he is a lawyer by profession said that if accept this special motion, it will be discuss in the afternoon at 4:30pm, not now. Then he further stated that since he, the Deputy Speaker, stated that since he feel that is no need for immerdiate resolution, then the move to raise parlimentary practices no. 18(3) is void.
At last, Datuk Wan Junaidi Tuanku using parlimentary practice no 43, which claim that the decision of the Speaker is the last to reject the special motion raised.
Source: http://www.chinapress.com.my/content_new.asp?dt=2008-05-30&sec=malaysia&art=0530m99a25.txt
（吉隆坡29日訊）國會下議院今日基于案件，已帶上法庭，以及不需即時處理的兩大理由，駁回沙登區國會議員張念群，針對雪州皇冠城封路引發流血事件的緊急動議。
副議長拿督旺朱乃迪的決定，惹來反對黨議員的不滿，當場引發一場超過15分鐘的舌戰。
面對新丁“小辣椒”張念群據理力爭，還有民主行動黨3大巨頭，即怡保西區議員古拉、大山腳區議員章瑛、靈北區議員潘儉偉的聲援圍攻，副議長一度大叫“多窿”（Tolong），一邊關掉擴音器“消音”，一邊請眾議員坐下，避免繼續喧鬧不休。
旺朱乃迪說，第一，議長認為就此事，不需要即時處理；第二，此事已帶上法庭，根據議會常規，不可在議會討論。
場面混亂
潘儉偉打岔說，如果涉及被毆打事件，國會仍可討論；副議長則要求他別干預，因仍有很多重要課題要討論。
他指出，知道此事十分重要，但身為立法委員，本身需贊同國家條規。
張念群不認同此說法，因為這是克連沙嘉大道公司，與發展商之間的事，且警方被指毆打人民，此事態嚴重。
律師出身的古拉，援引議會常規第18（3）條文，指當獲得超過15名議員支持，國會必須同意此緊急動議。
自稱也是律師的旺朱乃迪回應說，如果接受這項動議，可以帶到下午4時30分辯論，但不是現在；但議長之前已駁回，對方認為不需要即時處理，因此不可援引議會常規第18（3）條文。
最后，旺朱乃迪援引議會第43條文，即議長權力為最后決定，駁回這項緊急動議，也制止有點混亂的場面。
My 2 cents worth: I am really speechless after readding this article. I dunno how to differenciate what is important and what is not anymore. You tell me
No comments:
Post a Comment